CLICK IMAGE IF INTERESTED

Rapist set free because ‘he thought victim was someone else’

In a shocking case, an alleged rapist is walking around free after prosecutors declined to prosecute him when he argued that he thought the victim was someone else.

The case occurred in Davidson Country, Tennesse in the United States. The victim, Amy Dewland, has waived her right to privacy as a victim of sexual assault and wants people to know her story and how badly she has been treated by the criminal justice system.

Advertisements

Dewland reached out to local broadcaster Fox 17 News, saying the decision not to prosecute by the District Attorney’s Office in Davidson County is just as horrible as the rape.

READ THIS
Pastor stabs wife to death during church service

The District Attorney’s Office is arguing that they cannot prove that her rapist “knowingly assaulted her.” Amy alleges that the man crawled into the bed she fell asleep in after a party and sexually assaulted her. She says that the man later claimed he was drunk and thought she was someone else with whom he had a sexual relationship.

Advertisements

“It shouldn’t matter, because the bottom line is, there was no consent given. So it doesn’t matter who he thinks he’s touching, there was still no consent to it,” Dewland said.

Amy also shared emails that she received from the detective who investigated the case in which he informed her of the decision by the District Attorney’s office.

READ THIS
Pope probes Italian priest over Kenyan love child

Amy,

I do have some news, but unfortunately it’s that the DA’s office has declined to pursue prosecution on the case. The explanation that I received is basically this:

Advertisements

“The State believes there is evidence that a sexual encounter occurred between the parties. However, the circumstances surrounding the incident are at issue.

“Based on the facts above, it appears that Crimmons would testify that he thought he was touching Jessica who he was in a casual sexual relationship with at the time.

“Further, Jessica would testify that she would not have been uncomfortable with this given their relationship. It seems mistake of fact as a defense could be asserted.

READ THIS
"I couldn’t sleep if I didn’t hear her voice" - Catholic Priest dumps priesthood after falling in love

Mistake of fact is a defense to prosecution if such mistake negates the culpable mental state of the charged offense. Based on the totality of the facts and circumstances, the consensus of multiple assistant district attorney’s is that there is NOT sufficient evidence to prosecute for Rape “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Therefore, prosecution is not recommended at this time. Should additional evidence present itself, this matter may be revisited.”

Advertisements
Advertisements

NOTICE!

Click HERE  let’s have your story! Thanks as you support us by sharing this post.

CLICK IMAGE IF INTERESTED

COMMENTS...